In the first quarter of 2018, 59 research papers were published on Egypt by 22 think tanks internationally. More than half of the research papers and policy analysis published focused on the 2018 presidential elections, the Egyptian political landscape, the economy, and foreign aid. Fewer papers focused on the human rights situation, judicial affairs, military
Learn MoreFrom January to late May, a range of think tanks and international organizations published detailed reports and papers regarding human rights violations in Egypt committed by the Egyptian government and its security apparatus since the military coup in July 2013. Violations include suppressing opposing candidates from elections, sexual assault from security forces, to torture and
Learn MoreBetween late January and early April international institutions and think tanks issued a variety of reports and papers regarding the Egyptian elections of 2018. Analysis and commentary started prior to the elections with researchers listing concerns, expectations, and hopes for the event. This extended to the actual elections up until and after the announcement of
Learn MoreFrom January to mid March of this year, around 35 policy papers and investigative articles on Egypt were published by 55 think tanks and institutions who regularly publish on Egypt. More than half of the research papers and policy analysis published focused on the 2018 presidential elections, the political landscape, the economy and foreign aid.
Learn MoreThis piece provides an overview and high level analysis of the publications compiled on this platform at its launch. It is important to note that the analysis and conclusions are drawn from the classification done of recent publications (since 2015) by a sample of 34 credible international institutions (think tanks, research institutes, human rights organizations,
Learn MoreMEPP © 2018 All Rights Reserved Terms of Use and Privacy Policy
The publications re-posted on www.me-policy.org are available to the public and are not MEPP original publication. Each publication includes a reference to the source location. MEPP is not responsible for, nor does it necessarily endorse its content. Any views expressed are solely those of the author or publisher and do not necessarily reflect those of MEPP. Experts listed on MEPP are are independent or affiliated with their respective institutions and have no affiliation to MEPP.